Posts Tagged ‘vitamin d’

Vitamin D

By Trevor Shewfelt, Pharmacist at the Dauphin Clinic Pharmacy

“Look. I understand too little too late. I realize there are things you say and do in life that you can never take back. But what would you be if you didn’t even try. You have to try. So, after a lot of thought, I’d like to reconsider. Please. If it’s not too late. Make it a … cheese burger.” I love the lyrics from the song “Here I am” by Lyle Lovett and His Large Band. You are sure Lyle is going one way and then he U-turns on you. Kinda like when a diabetes talk turns to a fish oil.

When I was at the Diabetes Health Expo at the Senior’s Center in February, people in the audience threw lots of interesting questions at us on the experts panel. However, the question of omega-3 fatty acids, fish oil and vitamin d came up again and again. I was surprised there weren’t more questions about blood sugar machines or different types of insulin pens. In the pharmacy recently a lady stopped me to ask about Vitamin D for cancer prevention. Her doctor had recommended it for her husband. It seems like Vitamin D is on people’s minds again, and there is good reason.

What is Vitamin D? As usual, there isn’t a simple answer. There are different forms of Vitamin D, but the most potent form is called calcitriol. The type of Vitamin D your body makes is called Vitamin D3 (or cholecalciferol). The formation is complicated, but it goes like this. A Pre- Vitamin D3 is converted to Vitamin D3 in the skin with the help of sunlight (UV Radiation). Vitamin D3 is converted to a second form in the liver called calcidiol. The calcidiol is converted to calcitriol by the kidney. Again calcitriol is the most active form. So you can get Vitamin D3 from taking pills, having your skin make it from sunshine or eating things like fish. Then you hope your kidneys are healthy enough to convert the Vitamin D3 to calcitriol. There is another form of Vitamin D called Vitamin D2 . It is formed by plants and it can be converted to calcitriol in your body as well. There are those that argue that Vitamin D2 doesn’t form calcitriol as well at Vitamin D3.

Why do we care about Vitamin D? The most important thing about Vitamin D is still that it helps your gut absorb calcium. We know this because young children who don’t get enough Vitamin D develop rickets. Rickets is a condition characterized by bone deformities and “soft bones” which don’t have enough calcium. If we treat these children with Vitamin D and/or sunlight, their bones get better. This is why we give breast fed babies a Vitamin D supplement called D-Vi-Sol. We assume that the newborns aren’t put in the sun (mostly because we told the mothers not too) and the mothers aren’t in the sun either. Once the babies go onto formula or milk, they don’t need the Vitamin D supplement anymore.

So we need Vitamin D to absorb calcium. That isn’t a new recommendation. Why is Vitamin D in the news? Well, a few things have changed lately. First, we are all probably getting less Vitamin D than we did before. We are using more sunscreen which is good for preventing skin cancer, but it reduces the Vitamin D our skin can produce. We spend less and less time outdoors, and as people age their bodies are less good at absorbing Vitamin D from their diet. The second thing is the recommendations for how much Vitamin D we need keeps going up. It used to be 400 IU of Vitamin D was fine. Now we don’t think 400 IU of Vitamin D will prevent fractures in adults. The recommendations are for at least 400 IU if you are healthy and less than 50. If you are over 50, you should consider 800 to 1000 IU. Vitamin D is generally considered safe up to 2000 IU, and some of the cancer trials are recommending that much. There was even a heart trial in the US that used 4000 IU per day, because that is how much Vitamin D is required to get adequate levels in overweight people. I’m not sure I want to recommend 4000 IU to everyone yet without talking to their doctor first.

Another reason that Vitamin D seems to be in the news more is that it is inexpensive, relatively safe and every time we turn around it seems to do another good thing for us. Let’s look at some of the new health claims Vitamin D has.

I was at care home meeting and a patient’s daughter if her mom could be put on more Vitamin D. “It has been proven to reduce falls,” she said. I had no idea, so I looked it up. Sure enough in the February 2008 issue of the Journal of the American Geriatric Society there was a study that said nursing home patients on 800 IU of Vitamin D fell less than ones on less Vitamin D or on placebo.

Dr. Philippe Autier, MD from the International Agency for Research on Cancer in France did a meta-analysis that was published in the September 10, 2008 issue of Archives of Internal Medicine. A meta-analysis lumps a bunch of other studies together to look for trends. It isn’t considered as reliable as a randomized placebo controlled trial, but they often give us interesting information for further study. This meta-analysis showed Vitamin D supplementation seemed to make you less likely to die from all causes (including cancer, diabetes and heart problems). The problem is that a meta-analysis can’t draw any conclusions about which dose of Vitamin D is best or why Vitamin D does go things.

The Canadian Cancer Society now recommends 1000 IU of Vitamin D ( in consultation with your doctor) during the fall and winter.

Low blood levels of Vitamin D seem to make men more likely to have heart attacks. In the June 9, 2008 Archives of Internal Medicine they looked at a lot of men who hadn’t had heart problems and followed them for 6 years. Then they counted who had heart attacks. Even after they eliminated the differences due to smoking, diabetes, high blood pressure, cholesterol levels and other factors, the men with higher blood levels of Vitamin D had fewer heart attacks.

Multiple Sclerosis and Vitamin D may have a relationship, but that relationship is unclear. The further you live from the equator, the more likely you are to get MS. Is that because you get more sun and thus more Vitamin D near the equator? Maybe. Studies have shown people with high levels of Vitamin D in them have a lower risk of getting MS, but giving people with MS Vitamin D hasn’t shown much success. Recently researchers in Canada and the UK found that if you have a defective gene that normally converts Vitamin D to the active form you are more likely to get MS. So the complicated dance continues.

Other studies have hinted that Vitamin D may make you less likely to get colorectal cancer and or be more likely to survive breast cancer.

So Vitamin D is probably good for you, especially in dark cold Canada where we are covered up much of the year. But exactly what good things Vitamin D does for you is unclear. To paraphrase Mr. Lovett, “If Ford is to Chevrolet, what Dodge is to Chrysler, what Corn Flakes are to Post Toasties, what the clear blue sky is to the deep blue sea, what Hank Williams is to Neil Armstrong, can you doubt you and Vitamin D were made for each other?”

As always if you have any questions or concerns about these products, ask your pharmacist.
The information in this article is intended as a helpful guide only. It is not intended to be used as a substitute for professional advice. If you have any questions about your medications and what is right for you see your doctor, pharmacist or other health care professional.

We now have this and most other articles published in the Parkland Shopper on our Website. Please visit us at

Lyle Lovett and His Large Band – “Here I Am” :

Does Calcium Cause Heart Attacks? – Audio

By Trevor Shewfelt.  Recorded by the nice people at 730 CKDM, The Parkland’s Best Music

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.



By Trevor Shewfelt, Pharmacist at the Dauphin Clinic Pharmacy

We now have this and most other articles published in the Parkland Shopper on our Website.  Please visit us at

The information in this article is intended as a helpful guide only.  It is not intended to be used as a substitute for professional advice.  If you have any questions about your medications and what is right for you see your doctor, pharmacist or other health care professional.

Who knew a census could be exciting?  This summer, Stephen Harper’s Conservative Government told everyone they were going to get rid of the long form census.  This got everyone from Francophone’s to Municipal Governments to businesses excited.  You see many, many people rely on the information from the census to make their policy decisions.   The Harper Conservatives said the long form census was intrusive.  They didn’t like that the current legislation threatened jail time if someone didn’t complete it.  The part of the debate I found exciting, though, was the lie.  Industry Minister Tony Clement said Statistics Canada believed the information collected from a voluntary survey would be as accurate as that from a mandatory census.  This lie so upset head of Statistics Canada, Munir Sheikh, that he quit in protest.

There was another mis-truth this summer that more directly affected me.  I not saying the media lied when they started saying calcium supplements caused heart attacks, but it wasn’t the whole truth.  Let me tell you my story.  I had a customer in her seventies call me out to the vitamin aisle.  She had been taking calcium supplements for years, but now she had heard that it would cause heart attacks.  She wanted to know how much calcium she should take to keep her bones strong, but not so much as to give her a heart attack.

Where did this fear inspiring headline come from?  There was a study done in New Zealand and published in the July 29, 2010 British Medical Journal by Mark J. Bolland et al.  The study was a meta-analysis.  Although different types of studies might sound boring, this is important.  The best type of study is called a double-blind placebo controlled trial.  In this type of trial a drug is given to half the study participants and a sugar pill is given to the other half.  Neither the study participants nor the researchers know who gets what until after the study is over.  That way we can be sure that an effect found in the drug group was really caused by the drug.  A meta-analyis is different.  The researchers in New Zealand never ran a trial at all.  They took a bunch of other people’s trials, threw the results into a computer and looked at what came out.  A meta-analyis has several inherent problems.  Were the researchers biased when the picked the trials they included?  Were the trials done in similar ways?  You can’t mash an apple and an orange together and expect to get apple sauce just because they are both fruit.  In the same way, not all studies are set up the same way and their results can’t always be mashed together.

Meta-analyses are not terrible things.  But, I my opinion, they should usually be done to generate a new hypothesis for a new double-blind placebo controlled trials to test.  They shouldn’t be plastered all over the news as the “truth”.  When a meta-analysis hits the papers saying calcium supplements cause heart attacks, people over react.  This meta-analysis from New Zealand said people over the age of 40 who take 500 mg or more of calcium per day have more heart attacks than those who don’t.  One theory to explain this is that too much calcium might harden the blood vessels.

Don’t throw out your calcium supplements yet.  Remember this was a meta-analysis.  In fact another meta-analyis published by Wang, et. al in the March 2, 2010 Annals of Internal Medicine looked at this issue from a slightly different angle.  They looked to see if calcium plus Vitamin D prevented heart problems.  The studies they looked at showed a some evidence Vitamin D prevented heart problems, but it wasn’t strong.  They found calcium didn’t seem to effect heart problems one way or the other.  So the experts haven’t decided yet if calcium effects the heart or not.  So you shouldn’t stop your calcium because you are worried about heart attacks.  The jury is still out on that.

Why should you take calcium supplements? The main reason to take calcium is to help keep your bones strong.  The current recommendation is 1000-1200 mg of calcium per day.  Should you take them with or without Vitamin D?  Calcium should be taken with Vitamin D because Vitamin D helps the gut absorb calcium.  The current recommendation is 800 to 2000 IU of Vitamin D per day.  If we treat 50 post-menopausal women with 1000 mg of calcium per day for 5 years, we will prevent one fracture.  As we get older a broken bone is not just an inconvenience.  It can mean the difference between staying in your own home or ending up in a hospital or nursing home.  Another study by Haentjens et. al in March 16, 2010 Annals of Internal Medicine says older adults are 5-8 times more likely to die in the first 3 months after a hip fracture than people their age that didn’t break a hip.  So the benefits of calcium and Vitamin D can be huge.

So remember not everything you hear from a politician or on a new report are always true.  Get a second opinion before the next health story you hear on the news makes you want to panic.

We are always looking for new ideas for these articles.  If you have any topic suggestions, please email us at

BMJ Article: Effect of calcium supplements on risk of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular events: meta-analysis –

Annals of Internal Medicine abstract: Systematic Review: Vitamin D and Calcium Supplementation in Prevention of Cardiovascular Events –

 As always if you have any questions or concerns about these products, ask your pharmacist.

Phone / Fax / Toll Free
After Hours:204-638-2778

Pharmacy Hours
Mon - Fri8:30am - 6:30pm
Sat9:00am - 2:00pm
Sun & HolidaysNoon - 2:00pm